Sunday, October 30, 2022

The death of Toronto’s alternative weeklies: NOW, EYE Weekly, Grid


I remember, back in Ye Olden Days when I was a boy, you had to pay for music. Not just because you wanted to support artists. But because buying music was the only way you could listen to it.

I mean, back before we all had the internet in our pocket — back before many of us even had the internet in our homes — there were radios, often playing music for free. Music videos on TV. Sure. But if you wanted to listen to a particular song at the time of your choosing, or hear a band that didn’t have any hits on the charts, you had to go out and buy their record. Or, if they were in town, buy a ticket to see them play a show live.

So here’s the thing: back then, I was broke. Too broke to buy very much music. Worse, I was still at an age when it seemed important to me to know what all the new hot music was about.

The way I would solve that problem is that every Thursday, I would pick up the free alternative weekly newspapers — Now magazine and Eye Weekly — and read all the record reviews and all the live show reviews and all the previews. That obviously wasn’t the same as hearing all the music, but it gave me a sense of what these bands were doing, what passionate people thought of them, what the music scene in this city was like.

And I would read the rest of those free weeklies the same way, and for much the same purpose: the news section told me what activist countercultural types were thinking about issues that went beyond the topics of the main political parties and nightly newscasts; the theatre section gave me an overview of drama productions big and small; the movie reviews offered buying advice for Hollywood fare but also made me conversant in obscure foreign and indie films I knew I’d never likely see.

The back pages offered sex advice columns that were more blunt and spicy — and often more inclusive — than anything you’d read in your family newspaper. The classifieds seemed like the place to find a great job for a young person or an ideal student apartment. The “missed connection” ads in the personals were whole mini-narratives of romances that could have been — and a weekly ritual of imagining you might recognize yourself as a character in one.

And those papers were a resource when I was looking to leave the house and maybe spend some money: pages and pages of listings of events, and ads from bars telling you who was playing where, and a coupon that would get you into the Dance Cave without paying the cover.

For the young and broke, those papers were a one-stop city guide: advice for living, ammunition for fighting about politics, intel for discussing the arts. They let you know what was going on — not in the corridors of power, which you might learn from a daily paper, but in the streets where we lived and in the spots we wanted to hang out. Sometimes they were funny. Sometimes they were weird. They were usually a reliable way to pass the time in a coffee shop or on a subway ride. And they were free, which was the right price for my budget.

Later, I got my start in this business working at the free weeklies. It was as much fun as it looked.

I’ve missed them as they’ve slowly died off. Eye Weekly (where I worked) died long ago, and its successor the Grid (where I also worked) folded a few years after that. Now magazine has been visibly wasting away for most of a decade, and after the public quitting of all its remaining staff (who say they had not been paid for months) in September, it seemed to have reached the end. The same has happened in other cities across North America.

So I was excited to see the announcement of the launch of the Grind, a new “alt-weekly style” publication financed by its editors and launched earlier this month. It’s available in print at some Toronto bookstores and subway station newsstands. It isn’t available online. I ran out to find it.

“There’s a void in this city, especially with Now magazine seemingly out of print,” the editors write in the inaugural issue of what for now seems to be a bimonthly. “Toronto needs a gritty free magazine now as much as ever.” Agreed there.

It isn’t what those old free weeklies were, and it isn’t trying to be. It’s focused nearly exclusively, in its first issue, on political issues, with essays and reports mostly reprinted from leftist online spaces like Canadian Dimension, Press Progress and briarpatch.

It has no arts coverage or listings, which were always such an essential part of the link alt-weeklies gave readers to their cities — though the inaugural editor’s letter says they plan to expand arts and culture content. Even without it, the Grind remains dedicated to serving the young and the broke. Loudly, proudly, this is a paper for the working class, advocating on their behalf, telling their stories.

It doesn’t completely scratch my itch for the old, familiar alt weeklies. But then why should it? I’m a middle-class, middle-aged guy, employed gainfully in the mainstream media. It’s not made for me. It’s made as an alternative to me.

I hope they grow and thrive.

And reading it, getting the newsprint on my fingertips, reminded me to renew my subscription to the West End Phoenix, the other print-based inheritor of the alt weekly tradition in Toronto. Dave Bidini, who was both a contributor to and (with his band the Rheostatics) subject of coverage in those old alt weeklies, founded the Phoenix as a community paper, but in my mind it fills some of the same alt weekly hole, giving smaller, neighbourhood-level street coverage of the city’s faces and places, and celebrating local arts and artists.

The world is a different place, things change. Alt weeklies might not be coming back. But as much as both the Grind and West End Phoenix are working to keep their spirited newsprint tradition alive, I’ll be rooting for them. And reading them.

Please share this

Wednesday, October 26, 2022

BlogTO was purchased for $15 Million by Zoomer Media

On the Monday show

This is what a $15 million website in Toronto looks like

blogTO founder Tim Shore explains the outlet's click-chasing business model

Tim Shore rejects the suggestion that blogTO engages in “clickbait.”

In a 2020 Reddit AMA, the outlet’s founder cited a definition once proffered by The New York Times, which limits the term to headlines that misrepresent an article’s contents. However, Shore said, headlines “shouldn’t give the entire contents of the article away so people feel they can just skim headlines and not actually read anything.”

Hence some of the those currently found on blogTO’s homepage: “Toronto cafe known for pretty brunch permanently closing“; “Toronto just got weird-looking coffee cups and people are already complaining“; and “A sinkhole that looks like a portal to Hell just opened up in downtown Toronto.”

In January, Shore sold the site to Moses Znaimer’s ZoomerMedia for $15 million.

On this week’s CANADALAND, Shore sits down with host Jesse Brown to explain the lucrative business of click-chasing, volume-based web publishing:

 


This is a condensed and edited version of the conversation between Canadaland founder/publisher Jesse Brown and blogTO founder/publisher Tim Shore.

Jesse Brown: How the hell is your company worth $15 million? Like, what is the annual revenue of blogTO?

Tim Shore: So I mean, I can’t get into financials, obviously, because ZoomerMedia is a public company, so I’m not at liberty to really speak about that anymore. What I can tell you is that, prior to acquisition — at least I hope I can say this — blogTO was a profitable company, growing in terms of revenue as well as audience, year over year.

Brown: Tell me how you make money.

Shore: So the biggest misconception — and there’s a lot of them about blogTO — is that the content is paid for. If you go to the website, none of the content is paid for. It’s all editorial. People somehow assume that if we write about a local business, a restaurant, whatever, that they’ve paid us for that. That is not the case. Certainly, if we were to do anything that is sponsored — and we do a lot of sponsored stuff on social media — it’s all marked and clearly flagged as sponsored content.

Brown: People think that the articles on blogTO are all paid for because you love everything. “Toronto is getting a Big Sean pop-up shop.” “Toronto is getting a Bill Murray Day.” “Toronto is getting a brunch festival.” “Toronto is getting a cheap pie day.” “Toronto is getting a gourmet samosa food truck.” “Toronto is getting a Hawaiian poke restaurant.” “Toronto is getting a funnel cake restaurant.” “Toronto is getting a Friends Central Perk coffee shop.” Toronto’s always gettin’ something great.

Shore: Well, they’re not always great, but they’re gettin’ something.

Brown: Advertisers have never liked like hard news: death and misery and social issues. That’s why newspapers had travel sections, food sections, automotive sections. It was a safe place for advertising. When I look at blogTO and dozens of sites — you’re part of an industry that’s popped up — the general tone is happy and like a celebration of Toronto. And I think that that’s a very advertiser-friendly format.

Shore: But you have to also appreciate that content that is either strongly positive, or possibly the opposite, is more algorithm-friendly. So you’re gonna be seeing more of that in your social feeds.

Brown: It’s not just what advertisers want, it’s what people respond to.

Shore: It’s what people respond to.

Brown: You’re trying to entice people to click on the headline with the exact combination of words that is gonna get the most clicks that accurately reflects what they’re gonna get on the other end of that click.

Shore: I think that’s fair.

Brown: And you’re pretty damn precise about it. Do you do A/B testing?

Shore: We do a lot of testing. We are very analytically driven. Analytics really drives a lot of our editorial decisions, unfortunately, as well as the way that we package content.

Brown: Why is it unfortunate?

Shore: Well, because I think there’s stories that we haven’t figured out a way to get readers to engage with, that we don’t pursue because the analytics are really poor.

Brown: What kind of stories are those?

Shore: I mean, like writing about local theatre productions, for example. We’d love to do more of that. People don’t read it.

Brown: It seems to me that the story of blogTO is one where you were locked in this dead-heat competition with Torontoist, and then you kind of pulled ahead. And it feels to me like they went, “Let’s really focus on civic journalism.” And that’s how they fucked themselves.

Shore: I don’t know if that’s how they effed themselves, but yeah, we had a different content strategy than Torontoist. I think the notion of local journalism, when people talk about local media, they make the mistake of always referring to civic journalism, city hall, political discussions. That is a very small fraction of what people living in a city are interested in. And in fact, a lot of people are not interested in that. They want to know what’s happening in their neighbourhood. They want to know what that weird thing is, you know, that someone is building down the street. They want to know where to eat and what events to go to. There’s a huge range of content that people living in a city care about. And the idea that it all revolves around city hall is totally, you know, a mistruth.

Brown: Is this just a volume business of, like, the more traffic, the more money?

Shore: We try to monetize the audience. The eyeballs. So it is a game where you got to build traffic. Last year, we delivered 350 million pageviews. That’s about 30 million a month. And so we’re trying to monetize each of those pages. Regardless of what the CPMs are [i.e., the ad rates, measured as a cost per 1,000 impressions], it’s all about volume. The more impressions you can deliver, the more revenue you’re gonna be generating.

Brown: What would be a good CPM for blogTO content?

Shore: I think if you’re doing $16 or higher, it’s decent.

Brown: So for every 1,000 people who see something, the advertiser is gonna pay you $16. I used to blog for Maclean’s, and we would do a little happy dance if a post hit 10,000 views. How many people does a really good post on blogTO hit?

Shore: Our top-performing posts on a weekly basis will be in the hundreds of thousands.

Brown: Every week.

Shore: Every week. Yeah. Those will be our top posts. And I would say, internally, anything less than 20,000 is generally considered not a success.

Brown: This is like a long-term science experiment, inquiring into “What do people want to read about?” There’s actually an answer to that question. And since you started the site in 2004, you’ve been essentially refining and refining…

Shore: Correct.

Brown: You know what Toronto wants to read about.

Shore: And so, you know, if people are wondering why we’re still writing about Drake, stop reading the Drake articles. We’re writing about him because every time we write about him, it generally does well.

Brown: Have you ever created content knowing that you’re lining up a certain sponsor?

Shore: Local publications have figured out by now that there are certain topics that advertisers like to be around. And a lot of them are seasonal. You know, when summer comes along, there’s a whole advertising base that wants to be around patio-related content or road trips that you can go on.

But I want to make sure that your audience understands the difference between selling an advertising package to an advertiser on, let’s say, real estate content, versus something that would be considered branded editorial or paid content. Over the years, we have gotten a massive influx of demand for that kind of content that we just flatly rejected. In many cases, those advertisers just went to one of our competitors and bought it from them, because they sell it. So about a couple months ago, we tested the waters with doing a small selection of these, mostly for cannabis advertisers.

Brown: I always figured, and I think a lot of people figure, that the ads on the website are how you make your money. Is that true?

Shore: We do make money from the website. But in fact, it’s not our main revenue source. It was, back in the day. But, you know, media has evolved, blogTO has evolved, and our audience has evolved.

Brown: So what’s your main revenue source?

Shore: These days, if you’re not following blogTO on social media and seeing all the original content that we’re creating across various social media platforms, you’re really not seeing the whole story. I know people like to focus a lot on the articles that we create, but we’ve got a social media and video team that is out in the city every day, creating original content for Instagram and TikTok. We’re active on Twitter. We’re about to launch two new shows on Snap. We’re obviously on Facebook. There’s a lot we’re doing on social media that people need to pay attention to.

Brown: How do those ads work?

Shore: The interesting thing about social media is that the platforms were largely developed with sponsored placements baked in, and therefore the audience that is using those social platforms is used to seeing these sponsored posts. And as a user, if you’re scrolling through your Instagram feed, you’ll see photos and videos clearly marked as sponsored. So we have a very large following on many social media platforms. We’ve been able to monetize that successfully through ongoing sponsored posts for various brands and advertisers.

Brown: How’s Moses Znaimer?

Shore: We’re really looking forward to the relationship. I mean, the thing with Moses is he’s such an iconic figure in the Canadian media landscape [having co-founded Citytv, MuchMusic, etc.], and he’s so passionate about local journalism and local media, which is why we feel that this is such a great fit.

Brown: And he made you a millionaire.

Shore: Well, you know, it’s… it’s interesting, you know… it’s actually, I would say… hopefully… What am I trying to say here?

Brown: I don’t know. You should just say “Thanks.”

Shore: Yeah. Thanks, Moses. I mean, it’s tricky to figure out these days what a site or brand like blogTO might be worth: whether they underpaid, overpaid, whether both parties got good value. If we do what we’re planning on doing and we continue to grow the brand, then it should be worth a lot more one day — in which case, 15 million is gonna seem like a pretty cheap price.

Screencap of Shore at the ZoomerPlex from ZoomerMedia’s own ZNews coverage of its acquisition of blogTO.

Please share this

Wednesday, October 5, 2022

Toronto's real estate market just took an absolute nosedive


A troubling report shows declines across the board in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) housing market, as experts use words like "adjustment" to describe the sudden deflation of a bloated market in the face of historic inflation and higher borrowing costs.

The Toronto Regional Real Estate Board (TRREB) reports 5,038 sales in the region in September, marking a 44.1 per cent tailspin from the same period last year.

Listings were also down, but the decline was nowhere near as drastic, with a year-over-year drop of 16.7 per cent to 11,237. Still, this figure is the single-lowest number of new listings in any September since 2002, marking a 20-year low.

This has experts just as worried as the even greater drop in sales, with TRREB calling the slip "especially troublesome given that the stock of homes in the GTA increased markedly over the last 20 years."

"We must ensure that the temporary dip in housing demand is not allowed to mask the critical shortage of homes available for sale in the GTA," said TRREB President Kevin Crigger.

"Municipal council decisions have a direct impact on housing affordability, in terms of the protracted development approval processes, high development fees and other related policies that preclude timely housing development."

And the general public appears to agree with TRREB. A recent poll conducted by Ipsos Public Affairs found 71 per cent of GTA regions residents believe that municipalities should focus their efforts on increasing the supply of homes for sale and rent.

TRREB CEO John DiMichele puts pressure on elected councils in GTA municipalities to "reconsider existing policies that preclude homeowners from listing their homes for sale, including significant added upfront costs like the land transfer tax."

"Potential new policies like mandatory home energy audits could also create unnecessary interference and delays in the home selling process and dissuade some homeowners from listing their homes for sale."

DiMichele argues that "If councils continue to support policies that restrict new home development and existing home listings, such as exclusionary zoning, housing affordability will be severely hampered over the long term, which will also hamper our region's future growth."

Despite massive increases in the cost of living in the region, home prices are probably among the few areas where prices are actually dropping, at least by some metrics.

The average price GTA-wide dropped by 4.3 per cent year-over-year to $1,086,762, though this figure represents an increase over August 2022 prices.

"Hovering just below $1.1 million, the average selling price may have found some support during the last couple months of summer," said TRREB Chief Market Analyst Jason Mercer.

It now costs an average of $1,061,876 to buy a home in the 416, down from $1,090,422 during the same period last year. In the 905, prices dropped from $1,161,895 in Sept. 2021 to $1,099,938 in Sept. 2022.

Please share this